Articles
by Janet Jagan
A
Piece Of Guyana's History - 1953-1955
The Dialogue
Should Continue
The
Audit Commission -- Burying The False Accusations
The Dialogue Should
Continue
by Janet Jagan (May 2002)
The crime situation in Guyana has been commented upon by representatives of two
embassies in Guyana, the United States Ambassador Mr Ronald Godard and the Canadian High
Commissioner Mr Serge Marcoux. Both have decried the crime wave and the fact that it has
not been condemned by all sectors of our society. Mr Godard remarked that this has been
treated almost like a "legitimate subject for debate."
Both envoys pointed to the obvious fact that Guyana is a democratic society that
depends on the rule of law for its existence. And both promised assistance if requested.
All of what they had to say is true and a lot depends on restoring balance and good
sense to the awful happenings at the crime level. Can there be any justification for the
horrendous escape by the five prisoners and the subsequent deaths that have taken place?
The politicisation of all these happenings since the Mashramani breakout from the
Georgetown Prison has poisoned the atmosphere and prevented some thinking and reasonable
attitudes. Surely the whole of Guyanese society should be backing the Police in their
efforts to apprehend the criminals. These are no "Robin Hood" bandits, but those
hardened in the criminal world of guns, drugs and robbery.
Maybe the US Ambassador and the Canadian High Commissioner should urge their
governments to stop sending highly-trained and hardened criminals back to Guyana because
they were born here. Maybe there should be a limit to the time they have lived in North
America and learned their trade so well. Most went abroad as children or adolescents,
innocent when they left, but something else when deported to Guyana. That might ease our
problems.
But I agree with the US Ambassador that the dialogue should continue. When we examine
the reasons used by Mr Hoyte and his party for refusing to continue the dialogue, it is
really difficult to find a rational excuse. Everyone knows that this "pause in the
dialogue" and the boycott of Parliament, as well as all the other distasteful things
going on are part of a political game that hasn't changed very much in the last 40 years.
It happens whenever the PPP is in office. There was a dialogue initiated by Dr Jagan
when he was Premier in the 1961-64 period, but it was not continued. Instead, violence was
used as the best means of ousting the PPP and hoisting the PNC into office. That game of
violence resurged after the PPP won office legitimately in 1992, 1997 and 2001. For those
who like to say "plague on both houses," historical records tell the truth.
© 2002 Janet Jagan

The Audit
Commission -- Burying The False Accusations
by Janet Jagan
Now that the results of the Audit Team that was commissioned to assess the results of the
March 2001 elections is out, the PPP/Civic is again vindicated.
All the rubbish accusing the PPP/Civic of not being legally and fairly
elected is again laid to rest.
This is the second time that accusations leading to extensive violence by
the People's National Congress (PNC) have been proved to be false and malicious. The
poor-loser party used the excuse of rigged elections in 1997 and 2001 to violate the
people of Guyana. The trauma suffered by thousands of Guyanese on both occasions, the
attacks on local businesses and the massive ruin of property match the same violence
committed by the PNC in the 1960's.
In the '60s, Mr Burnham and his crew were not satisfied they got their
wish of changing the whole electoral system from first-past-the-post to proportional
representation. And having succeeded under the indomitable Cheddi Jagan of having free and
fair election in 1992, the PPP/Civic won overwhelmingly under proportional representation.
The PPP/Civic did even better in the 1997 election - winning the highest
percentage of votes in any election, including that of 1953. And for that convincing win
the PNC, supported strongly by the WPA, sought to nullify those elections on the grounds
of fraud. Of course, the Audit conducted by prominent Caribbean persons proved
conclusively that the elections of 1997 were above board and free and fair.
The PNC which had rigged all elections during its 28 years ruthless rule,
then proceeded to try to undo the proportional representation system of voting which that
party had forcibly advocated in the 1960s. The PPP/Civic had won convincingly under that
system in 1992 and 1997, so as far as the PNC was concerned, it needed change.
In the Constitution Commission set up following the Herdmanston Accord,
strong efforts were made to bring back elements of first-past-the-post to undermine the
proportional representation system that no longer could be used under conditions of fraud
to ensure that the PNC was back in government. What a ludicrous scenario!
After the violent protests over the 2001 elections, which began with
claims that the PNC lost due to electoral practices that hurt that party, it soon changed
its tune since no one was buying that charge and then continued the violence on charges
that Afro-Guyanese were "marginalized."
The PNC failed to remember what took place during its 28 years in office.
The slogan to "feed, clothe and house the nation" was a force
with agricultural production declining - forget about "clothing the nation" and
whatever housing the PNC engaged in, coming to a full stop! It was the PPP/Civic which
revived agriculture and started a new and vibrant housing programme that is finally coming
close to solving the horrific needs of people for housing.
And, by the way, what did the PNC government ever do to make Buxton better
off? The PPP/Civic did far more, restoring its roads, water, schools. The Buxton violence
is incomprehensible!
Again, Guyanese have had to face the unreasonable and uncalled-for wrath
of the PNC - for what? - for nothing! The Audit Report just out shows as most everyone
knew, that the March 2001 elections were free and fair, as were those of 1992 and 1997.
The historic riggers lost at their own game!
August 12, 2001
© 2001 Janet Jagan

A Piece Of Guyana's History
- 1953-1955
by Janet Jagan
In 1983, I wrote the following article published in Thunder marking the 30th
Anniversary of the suspension of the constitution in 1953 and the arrival of British
troops which invaded and took control of British Guiana after removing the democratically
elected government of the PPP led by Cheddi Jagan.
The year 1953 was one of great historical importance to all Guyanese. It
was the year of the first Guyanese people's victory of this century, when, organised and
led by the newly-formed People's Progressive Party, a resounding success was obtained at
the first elections ever held under universal adult suffrage. Led by the PPP, the people's
demands for self government had been partly won with Guyana (then British Guiana) having
one of the most advanced constitutions in the British Empire.
For 4 1/2 months, exactly 133 days, the PPP in office fought for and won
some significant changes for the people. The subversive literature law (introduced in the
previous parliament by Lionel Luckhoo) was repealed; the first steps for the removal of
church control of the schools were made; and a battle was waged over the right of workers
to be represented by the union of their choice by way of a poll. (Those were the days when
MPCA was foisted on the sugar workers who were denied the right to join a trade union of
their choice). It was on this issue, as well as others considered by the British to be
controversial, that the British government made the decision to remove the PPP from office
and suspend the Constitution.
The reasons given for this drastic decision were so ridiculous that the
Churchill government had a hard time making convincing charges. The government White Paper
on the suspension of the British Guiana Constitution alleged that there was a fire plot
hatched by the PPP to burn down the City of Georgetown! But those were the cold war days
and even the slightest tint of 'red' sent the Anglo-American imperialists into a frenzy.
In the same year, 1953, in June, the Mossadegh government which had nationalised the
Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, was overthrown by the CIA in Iran and one year later, the
progressive government of President Jacobo Arbenz of Guatemala was to suffer the same
fate.
British warships landed in Georgetown harbour, despatching marines and
other troops on that troubled day in October 1953. This was the beginning of a period of
martial law, of curfews, restrictions on the movements of certain leading members of the
PPP, the curtailment of most civil liberties, detention, searches and imprisonment.
The PPP decided to vigorously resist the measures and after opposition
from the opportunistic faction in the Executive Committee was out-voted, it was agreed
that PPP leader Cheddi Jagan would break the restriction orders on him (restricting him to
the boundaries of the City of Georgetown). This he did and was arrested, brought back to
Georgetown, held at Brickdam Police Station, put on trial and sent to prison. At Brickdam
Police Station, a large protest demonstration took place in which a number of leading
members of the party was arrested.
From then on there were many acts of defiance of the unjust restrictions
placed on the people by the British authorities. The intension of the Colonial Power was
to, once and for all, destroy the PPP and terrify and intimidate the awakened people. It
must not be forgotten that the Party was formed on the principles of fighting for the full
independence of British Guiana and then the building of a socialist society. This would
mean, of course, the end of British plunder of the wealth of the territory.
When Cheddi Jagan went to prison in 1954, it heightened the
anti-colonial struggle, sparked off the people's resistance and focused world attention on
the violations by Britain against our country. It was the first time in Guyana that the
jail held a political prisoner since the days of Rev. John Smith, over a century before.
Cheddi Jagan's days in prison were very full ones and reflect on his
complete commitment to the cause he represented and his thirst for more and more knowledge
and understanding, as well as his unrelenting drive to develop the people's consciousness
and lead them into struggle.
In his book The West On Trial, he said: "Prison life was
for me a new experience, a novel and welcome one in some respects. It gave me opportunity
for real leisure and rest. Apart from scrubbing floors, I developed a hobby in
carpentry... What I enjoyed most was the luxury of almost limitless time for reading and
writing. Novels, which I had never had much time to read, constituted the bulk of my
reading. Serious books were rare. And in the political field there was very little, other
than Tory propaganda material; the prison authorities had instituted a thorough screening
process. My articles for my party paper had to be written on toilet paper and smuggled out
because of the system of prison censorship."
The Archives of the PPP contain 233 pages of letters and articles which
Cheddi Jagan wrote from prison, all without the knowledge of the prison authorities. There
were more, but these were lost.
While in prison, his fight for better conditions for prisoners continued
throughout his term, causing him to be taken before the Superintendent of Prisons on more
than one occasion, and being charged for organising hunger strikes of protest. He wrote
articles on prison conditions, exposed the poor state of meals, led prison protests and
prepared questions to be sent to the British Labour Parliamentarian Jennie Lee, who, in
fact, tabled such questions in the House of Commons.
He wrote articles on - "British Lion Skinned", "End Wage
Slavery", "Surplus Value - Profit, Interest, Rents", "Guatemalan
Invasion", "Amerindian Sweat", and a series of definitions on freedom, self
determination, the almighty dollar, class struggle - to name a few.
In prison he organised a reading circle for prisoners and arranged for
literature (mostly political) to come into the prison clandestinely, so that prisoners
could read and learn.
He described an amusing, yet telling, episode in prison. There was in
the Georgetown prison at this time every Sunday, an "Uplift Hour." He got the
prisoners to request the Superintendent's permission to speak. The latter's answer was:
"since when is Jagan a parson?" Jagan told the prisoners to go back and tell the
Superintendent that he would speak on crime: "Thou shall not steal." Permission
was granted.
On Sunday, June 6, 1954 Prisoner Cheddi Jagan was the Speaker. He first
dealt with petty thievery, the laws and punishment from the early days when persons were
drawn and quartered for stealing things like sheep and goats. He then pointed out the
nature of capitalist robbery of the working class and told the prison audience that the
biggest thieves, who generally made the laws and were quick to apply the 'cals' were
outside the jails.
Two days later Cheddi Jagan was ushered before the prison authorities
and told that in future he could not take part in the "Uplift Hour." In protest
of this, the prisoners on the next Sunday, June 13, 1954, quietly lined up and marched
back to their cells.
From the books available to him, in the prison library and smuggled into
prison, he made many extracts for quotations to be printed in Thunder. Thunder was at that
time a weekly paper, edited by various members in and out of jail including Rory Westmaas,
Janet Jagan and Eric Huntley. Dr Jagan, in one of his prison letters, highly praised the
printer of Thunder for his courage in the face of many threats. Eventually, a permanent
police guard was stationed at the printery. At that time, the vicious editor of the Daily
Argosy, Seal Coon, was calling for the banning of Thunder and the deportation of the
Jagans.
One of the beautiful quotations he picked out was from the writing of
the late American Communist Joseph North (who visited Guyana in the '60s, and addressed a
Party Congress): "The people are indestructible. You can beat them down, chain them,
gag them, toll the bell for them, but they rise again, not mysteriously - inevitably! And
stronger each time! And those who speak their aspirations will never be silenced."
Another quotation he made from Faiz Ahmad Faiz, then in a Pakistan jail,
a poem entitled A few days more -
"Few are the moments left to oppression's sharp tooth
Patience, injustice has only a brief moment to reign!
In this parched desert of earth, this lingering sand.
We must endure for today - not for ever more." stay!
Nameless affliction, the weight of the foreigners' hand
We must endure for today - not for ever more."
In an article on Freedom of Movement, he chastised Barbados Premier
Grantley Adams, who, while restricting freedom of movement of PPP members, was criticising
Trinidad for not agreeing to this principle in framing the Federation's Constitution.
Jagan and Burnham had been denied entry to Barbados when returning from London in early
1954 and Ashton Chase was refused entry on his way to Caracas to attend a Conference.
And included in the prison letters was a poem Cheddi wrote, perhaps the
only one he ever had time to write:
DEATH OF IMPERIALISM
Today we strive to end our humanity's pains
To extract your oppression's painful tooth,
To cut your vicious circle of our lives -
- No work, no land, crime punishment, crime
But you tread with savage fascist steps
With quislings, and hired mercenaries
Willing and unwilling slaves and shares of your loot.
You keep your bayonets at our throats and shout
Law and Order must prevail!
Don't read that!
Don't say that!
Don't do that!
Don't go there!
Our beautiful country a vast prison you have made
And fences built to wrench us from our beloved -
our homes
our children
our brothers
our comrades
You beat us on our heads in the name of peace
While in cleric robes you call for peace
For you, peace is our grave and life hereafter
For us, peace is joy and life and laughter
For this we march tomorrow!
(Note: reference to "Savage" had a double meaning as the
British Governor's name was Alfred Savage).
The experiences of the early 1950s were of tremendous value in the
future development of the PPP. The Party gained experience of a popular mass party winning
limited power through elections and then to have the gains suddenly ripped away. The
people experienced gun-boat rule, the compliance of quislings who formed a puppet Interim
government, the manipulations and promises leading up to the split in the Party in 1955
and the continued efforts to break the spirit of the left-wing of the PPP (for from the
time of the split until after the 1957 elections there were 2 parties calling themselves
PPP, one led by Cheddi Jagan and the other by LFS Burnham) and to smash the Party.
That the British failed was made clear in 1957 when the people responded
to all the threats, calumny and slander by again giving the PPP a resounding victory at
the polls. It proved the validity of Joseph North's words that the people always rise
again, despite all that is done to keep them down. And that, we can say, applies to our
situation in the '80s!